Democratic Republic of the Congo vs United States of America: Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) — UNFCCC

Democratic Republic of the Congo
4,560 kt
in 2003
United States of America
646.92 kt
in 2020
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
2nd
United States of America rank
4th

Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) — UNFCCC over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • United States of America
02.0k4.0k6.0k199020052020

How they compare

Democratic Republic of the Congo currently reports 4,560 kt against 646.92 kt in United States of America, a difference of 3,913 kt.

That makes Democratic Republic of the Congo's figure about 7.0 times United States of America's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Democratic Republic of the Congo has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 2nd and United States of America ranks 4th of 45 countries.

Democratic Republic of the Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo United States of America Difference Ahead
1990s 5,347 kt 573.58 kt 4,773 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2000s 4,653 kt 622.77 kt 4,031 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher burning - crop residues — emissions (co2eq) (ar5) — unfccc, Democratic Republic of the Congo or United States of America?
Democratic Republic of the Congo, at 4,560 kt against 646.92 kt in United States of America as of 2003.
What is the difference in burning - crop residues — emissions (co2eq) (ar5) — unfccc between Democratic Republic of the Congo and United States of America?
3,913 kt, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and United States of America?
6 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2003.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and United States of America rank globally for burning - crop residues — emissions (co2eq) (ar5) — unfccc?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 2nd and United States of America ranks 4th of 45 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs United States of America: Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) — UNFCCC. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/burning-crop-residues-emissions-co2eq-ar5-unfccc/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/united-states-of-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/burning-crop-residues-emissions-co2eq-ar5-unfccc/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/united-states-of-america/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs United States of America: Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) — UNFCCC</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) — UNFCCC
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
50 places, 1,090 data points, 1990–2020
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf