Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4

Middle Africa
467.25 kt
in 2050
United Republic of Tanzania
279.08 kt
in 2050
Middle Africa rank
26th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
27th

Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 over time

  • Middle Africa
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0200400600196120052050

How they compare

Middle Africa currently reports 467.25 kt against 279.08 kt in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 188.17 kt.

That makes Middle Africa's figure about 1.7 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Middle Africa ahead.

Middle Africa ranks 26th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 27th of 33 groups.

Middle Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle Africa United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 132.27 kt 78.42 kt 53.85 kt Middle Africa
1970s 162.72 kt 97.76 kt 64.96 kt Middle Africa
1980s 184.09 kt 132.67 kt 51.42 kt Middle Africa
1990s 233.09 kt 140.43 kt 92.65 kt Middle Africa
2000s 283.42 kt 221.05 kt 62.36 kt Middle Africa
2010s 531.15 kt 329.63 kt 201.52 kt Middle Africa
2020s 661.51 kt 377.36 kt 284.16 kt Middle Africa
2030s 379.69 kt 264.04 kt 115.65 kt Middle Africa
2050s 467.25 kt 279.08 kt 188.17 kt Middle Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher burning - crop residues — emissions (co2eq) from ch4, Middle Africa or United Republic of Tanzania?
Middle Africa, at 467.25 kt against 279.08 kt in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2050.
What is the difference in burning - crop residues — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 between Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
188.17 kt, with Middle Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for burning - crop residues — emissions (co2eq) from ch4?
Middle Africa ranks 26th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 27th of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/burning-crop-residues-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/middle-africa/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/burning-crop-residues-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-fao-tier-1/middle-africa/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
248 places, 14,483 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf