Non-Annex I countries vs Sweden: Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual

Non-Annex I countries
1.25 % change on previous year
in 2023
Sweden
10 % change on previous year
in 2023
Non-Annex I countries rank
20th
Sweden rank
17th

Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual over time

  • Non-Annex I countries
  • Sweden
-40-2002040196219922023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 10 % change on previous year against 1.25 % change on previous year in Non-Annex I countries, a difference of 8.75 % change on previous year.

That makes Sweden's figure about 8.0 times Non-Annex I countries's.

The two have swapped places 40 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Sweden ahead.

Non-Annex I countries ranks 20th and Sweden ranks 17th of 40 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Non-Annex I countries averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Non-Annex I countries Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 1.68 % change on previous year 2.24 % change on previous year 0.557 % change on previous year Sweden
1970s 0.9508 % change on previous year 0.3572 % change on previous year 0.5936 % change on previous year Non-Annex I countries
1980s 0.9134 % change on previous year 2.94 % change on previous year 2.03 % change on previous year Sweden
1990s 0.7284 % change on previous year 1.66 % change on previous year 0.9332 % change on previous year Sweden
2000s 0.9282 % change on previous year 4.32 % change on previous year 3.39 % change on previous year Sweden
2010s 1.25 % change on previous year 3.73 % change on previous year 2.48 % change on previous year Sweden
2020s 1.48 % change on previous year 2.02 % change on previous year 0.5372 % change on previous year Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher burning - crop residues — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), annual, Non-Annex I countries or Sweden?
Sweden, at 10 % change on previous year against 1.25 % change on previous year in Non-Annex I countries as of 2023.
What is the difference in burning - crop residues — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), annual between Non-Annex I countries and Sweden?
8.75 % change on previous year, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Non-Annex I countries and Sweden?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Non-Annex I countries and Sweden rank globally for burning - crop residues — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), annual?
Non-Annex I countries ranks 20th and Sweden ranks 17th of 40 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Non-Annex I countries vs Sweden: Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/burning-crop-residues-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-annual-growth-rate/non-annex-i-countries/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/burning-crop-residues-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-annual-growth-rate/non-annex-i-countries/sweden/">Non-Annex I countries vs Sweden: Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
224 places, 11,970 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.