Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Middle Africa: Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O

Democratic Republic of the Congo
57.74 kt
in 2050
Middle Africa
114.64 kt
in 2050
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
7th
Middle Africa rank
4th

Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Middle Africa
050100150196120052050

How they compare

Middle Africa currently reports 114.64 kt against 57.74 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 56.9 kt.

That makes Middle Africa's figure about 2.0 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Middle Africa has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 7th and Middle Africa ranks 4th of 20 countries.

Middle Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Middle Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 11.75 kt 32.45 kt 20.69 kt Middle Africa
1970s 15.16 kt 39.91 kt 24.76 kt Middle Africa
1980s 21.08 kt 45.16 kt 24.09 kt Middle Africa
1990s 30.93 kt 57.18 kt 26.26 kt Middle Africa
2000s 32.31 kt 69.55 kt 37.24 kt Middle Africa
2010s 61.5 kt 130.33 kt 68.83 kt Middle Africa
2020s 71.56 kt 162.32 kt 90.76 kt Middle Africa
2030s 42.56 kt 93.17 kt 50.62 kt Middle Africa
2050s 57.74 kt 114.64 kt 56.9 kt Middle Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher burning - crop residues — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Middle Africa?
Middle Africa, at 114.64 kt against 57.74 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2050.
What is the difference in burning - crop residues — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Middle Africa?
56.9 kt, with Middle Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Middle Africa?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Middle Africa rank globally for burning - crop residues — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 7th and Middle Africa ranks 4th of 20 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Middle Africa: Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/burning-crop-residues-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/middle-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/burning-crop-residues-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/middle-africa/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Middle Africa: Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
235 places, 13,750 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf