How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sri Lanka?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Mauritius vs Sri Lanka: Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre

Mauritius

0 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Sri Lanka

0 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Mauritius rank

18th

Sri Lanka rank

17th

Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre over time

Mauritius
Sri Lanka

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 18th and Sri Lanka ranks 17th of 162 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Mauritius	Sri Lanka	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Mauritius
1970s	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Mauritius
1980s	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Mauritius
1990s	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Mauritius
2000s	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Mauritius
2010s	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Mauritius
2020s	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher burning - crop residues — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre, Mauritius or Sri Lanka?: Sri Lanka, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in burning - crop residues — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre between Mauritius and Sri Lanka?: 0 kt per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sri Lanka?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Sri Lanka rank globally for burning - crop residues — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?: Mauritius ranks 18th and Sri Lanka ranks 17th of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Sri Lanka: Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/sri-lanka/">Mauritius vs Sri Lanka: Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit: kt per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 163 places, 9,200 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 04 September 2026

Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.