Belarus vs Zambia: Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium
Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium over time
- Belarus
- Zambia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 2,812 t against 2,396 t in Zambia, a difference of 416 t.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.2 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 34th and Zambia ranks 36th of 73 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,270 t | 4,263 t | 6.67 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 2,684 t | 1,521 t | 1,164 t | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium, Belarus or Zambia?
- Belarus, at 2,812 t against 2,396 t in Zambia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium between Belarus and Zambia?
- 416 t, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Zambia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
- How do Belarus and Zambia rank globally for calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium?
- Belarus ranks 34th and Zambia ranks 36th of 73 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium carbonate — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf