Ecuador vs French Polynesia: Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium
Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium over time
- Ecuador
- French Polynesia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 t against 0 t in French Polynesia, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2016 it was French Polynesia ahead.
Ecuador ranks 64th and French Polynesia ranks 64th of 73 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | French Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2020s | 3,186 t | 0 t | 3,186 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium, Ecuador or French Polynesia?
- Ecuador, at 0 t against 0 t in French Polynesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium between Ecuador and French Polynesia?
- 0 t, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and French Polynesia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2022.
- How do Ecuador and French Polynesia rank globally for calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium?
- Ecuador ranks 64th and French Polynesia ranks 64th of 73 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium carbonate — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf