Estonia vs Malawi: Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium
Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium over time
- Estonia
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 12,713 t against 7,556 t in Estonia, a difference of 5,157 t.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.7 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Malawi ahead.
Estonia ranks 29th and Malawi ranks 26th of 73 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,690 t | 26,782 t | 21,091 t | Malawi |
| 2010s | 4,964 t | 22,606 t | 17,643 t | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium, Estonia or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 12,713 t against 7,556 t in Estonia as of 2016.
- What is the difference in calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium between Estonia and Malawi?
- 5,157 t, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Malawi?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2011.
- How do Estonia and Malawi rank globally for calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium?
- Estonia ranks 29th and Malawi ranks 26th of 73 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium carbonate — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf