Latvia vs Malawi: Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium
Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium over time
- Latvia
- Malawi
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 17,594 t against 12,713 t in Malawi, a difference of 4,881 t.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.4 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 24th and Malawi ranks 26th of 73 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14,242 t | 8,596 t | 5,645 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 4,729 t | 16,382 t | 11,653 t | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium, Latvia or Malawi?
- Latvia, at 17,594 t against 12,713 t in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium between Latvia and Malawi?
- 4,881 t, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Malawi?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2016.
- How do Latvia and Malawi rank globally for calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium?
- Latvia ranks 24th and Malawi ranks 26th of 73 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium carbonate — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf