Mexico vs Zimbabwe: Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium
Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium over time
- Mexico
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 6,914 t against 3,251 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 3,663 t.
That makes Mexico's figure about 2.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Mexico ranks 30th and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 73 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7,708 t | 6,690 t | 1,018 t | Mexico |
| 2010s | 3,999 t | 2,339 t | 1,660 t | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium, Mexico or Zimbabwe?
- Mexico, at 6,914 t against 3,251 t in Zimbabwe as of 2011.
- What is the difference in calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium between Mexico and Zimbabwe?
- 3,663 t, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Zimbabwe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2011.
- How do Mexico and Zimbabwe rank globally for calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium?
- Mexico ranks 30th and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 73 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium carbonate — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf