Austria vs Norway: Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium
Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium over time
- Austria
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 1.13 t against 0.76 t in Austria, a difference of 0.37 t.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.5 times Austria's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 62nd and Norway ranks 60th of 67 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 555.6 t | 23.7 t | 531.9 t | Austria |
| 2010s | 187,245 t | 47.56 t | 187,198 t | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium, Austria or Norway?
- Norway, at 1.13 t against 0.76 t in Austria as of 2024.
- What is the difference in calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium between Austria and Norway?
- 0.37 t, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Norway?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Austria and Norway rank globally for calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium?
- Austria ranks 62nd and Norway ranks 60th of 67 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium carbonate — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf