Brazil vs Bulgaria: Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium
Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium over time
- Brazil
- Bulgaria
How they compare
Bulgaria currently reports 389.9 t against 342 t in Brazil, a difference of 47.9 t.
That makes Bulgaria's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Bulgaria ahead.
Brazil ranks 36th and Bulgaria ranks 35th of 67 countries.
Bulgaria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Bulgaria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,514 t | 3,455 t | 1,941 t | Bulgaria |
| 2020s | 393.78 t | 2,257 t | 1,863 t | Bulgaria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium, Brazil or Bulgaria?
- Bulgaria, at 389.9 t against 342 t in Brazil as of 2024.
- What is the difference in calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium between Brazil and Bulgaria?
- 47.9 t, with Bulgaria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Bulgaria?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Bulgaria rank globally for calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium?
- Brazil ranks 36th and Bulgaria ranks 35th of 67 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium carbonate — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf