Slovenia vs Sweden: Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium
Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium over time
- Slovenia
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 1,496 t against 1,480 t in Slovenia, a difference of 16 t.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Sweden ahead.
Slovenia ranks 28th and Sweden ranks 27th of 67 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Slovenia averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovenia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 510.94 t | 3,638 t | 3,127 t | Sweden |
| 2010s | 3,714 t | 3,906 t | 191.83 t | Sweden |
| 2020s | 950.19 t | 882.79 t | 67.39 t | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium, Slovenia or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 1,496 t against 1,480 t in Slovenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium between Slovenia and Sweden?
- 16 t, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Sweden?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Slovenia and Sweden rank globally for calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium?
- Slovenia ranks 28th and Sweden ranks 27th of 67 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium carbonate — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf