Australia vs Djibouti: Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium
Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium over time
- Australia
- Djibouti
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 135 t against 128.89 t in Australia, a difference of 6.11 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 80th and Djibouti ranks 78th of 141 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Djibouti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 279.62 t | 124.17 t | 155.44 t | Australia |
| 2010s | 1,206 t | 49.22 t | 1,156 t | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium, Australia or Djibouti?
- Djibouti, at 135 t against 128.89 t in Australia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium between Australia and Djibouti?
- 6.11 t, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Djibouti?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Djibouti rank globally for calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium?
- Australia ranks 80th and Djibouti ranks 78th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium carbonate — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf