Bahamas vs Fiji: Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium
Bahamas
184.89 t
in 2024
Fiji
192 t
in 2022
Bahamas rank
77th
Fiji rank
76th
Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium over time
- Bahamas
- Fiji
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 192 t against 184.89 t in Bahamas, a difference of 7.11 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Bahamas ahead.
Bahamas ranks 77th and Fiji ranks 76th of 141 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 1 and Fiji in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Fiji | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 403.81 t | 2,204 t | 1,801 t | Fiji |
| 2010s | 645.01 t | 79.68 t | 565.33 t | Bahamas |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium, Bahamas or Fiji?
- Fiji, at 192 t against 184.89 t in Bahamas as of 2022.
- What is the difference in calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium between Bahamas and Fiji?
- 7.11 t, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Fiji?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2018.
- How do Bahamas and Fiji rank globally for calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium?
- Bahamas ranks 77th and Fiji ranks 76th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium carbonate — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf