Comoros vs Mongolia: Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium
Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium over time
- Comoros
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0.05 t against 0.02 t in Comoros, a difference of 0.03 t.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 2.5 times Comoros's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Comoros ranks 135th and Mongolia ranks 132nd of 141 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.66 t | 5,796 t | 5,795 t | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0.5367 t | 5,089 t | 5,088 t | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium, Comoros or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 0.05 t against 0.02 t in Comoros as of 2018.
- What is the difference in calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium between Comoros and Mongolia?
- 0.03 t, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Comoros and Mongolia rank globally for calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium?
- Comoros ranks 135th and Mongolia ranks 132nd of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium carbonate — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf