Cyprus vs Eswatini: Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium
Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium over time
- Cyprus
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 102 t against 100.8 t in Cyprus, a difference of 1.2 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Eswatini ahead.
Cyprus ranks 86th and Eswatini ranks 85th of 141 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 2 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,050 t | 2,416 t | 1,366 t | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 411.77 t | 141.06 t | 270.71 t | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 272.6 t | 77 t | 195.6 t | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium, Cyprus or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 102 t against 100.8 t in Cyprus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium between Cyprus and Eswatini?
- 1.2 t, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Eswatini?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Cyprus and Eswatini rank globally for calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium?
- Cyprus ranks 86th and Eswatini ranks 85th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium carbonate — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf