El Salvador vs Ghana: Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium
Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium over time
- El Salvador
- Ghana
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Ghana, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2005 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 137th and Ghana ranks 137th of 141 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Ghana in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,627 t | 49.02 t | 1,578 t | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 65.89 t | 7,112 t | 7,046 t | Ghana |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium, El Salvador or Ghana?
- El Salvador, at 0 t against 0 t in Ghana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium between El Salvador and Ghana?
- 0 t, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Ghana?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do El Salvador and Ghana rank globally for calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium?
- El Salvador ranks 137th and Ghana ranks 137th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium carbonate — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf