Georgia vs Panama: Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium
Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium over time
- Georgia
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 213.08 t against 208.61 t in Georgia, a difference of 4.47 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Panama ahead.
Georgia ranks 75th and Panama ranks 74th of 141 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Panama in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.88 t | 445.76 t | 438.89 t | Panama |
| 2010s | 445.47 t | 486.58 t | 41.11 t | Panama |
| 2020s | 473.76 t | 215.56 t | 258.19 t | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium, Georgia or Panama?
- Panama, at 213.08 t against 208.61 t in Georgia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium between Georgia and Panama?
- 4.47 t, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Panama?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
- How do Georgia and Panama rank globally for calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium?
- Georgia ranks 75th and Panama ranks 74th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium carbonate — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf