Guyana vs Niger: Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium
Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium over time
- Guyana
- Niger
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 12.03 t against 10 t in Niger, a difference of 2.03 t.
That makes Guyana's figure about 1.2 times Niger's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Guyana has been ahead every year.
Guyana ranks 106th and Niger ranks 108th of 141 countries.
Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 227.27 t | 10 t | 217.27 t | Guyana |
| 2010s | 165.62 t | 16.13 t | 149.48 t | Guyana |
| 2020s | 12.03 t | 10 t | 2.03 t | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium, Guyana or Niger?
- Guyana, at 12.03 t against 10 t in Niger as of 2024.
- What is the difference in calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium between Guyana and Niger?
- 2.03 t, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Niger?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do Guyana and Niger rank globally for calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium?
- Guyana ranks 106th and Niger ranks 108th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium carbonate — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf