Malaysia vs Uganda: Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium
Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium over time
- Malaysia
- Uganda
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 1,056 t against 692.85 t in Uganda, a difference of 363.15 t.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.5 times Uganda's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 55th and Uganda ranks 57th of 141 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,111 t | 50.13 t | 4,061 t | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 7,405 t | 265.75 t | 7,140 t | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium, Malaysia or Uganda?
- Malaysia, at 1,056 t against 692.85 t in Uganda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium between Malaysia and Uganda?
- 363.15 t, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Uganda?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and Uganda rank globally for calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium?
- Malaysia ranks 55th and Uganda ranks 57th of 141 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium carbonate — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf