Canada vs Croatia: Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium
Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium over time
- Canada
- Croatia
How they compare
Canada currently reports 340,000 t against 58,485 t in Croatia, a difference of 281,515 t.
That makes Canada's figure about 5.8 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 6th and Croatia ranks 8th of 46 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 357,333 t | 277,011 t | 80,322 t | Canada |
| 2010s | 340,000 t | 327,958 t | 12,042 t | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium, Canada or Croatia?
- Canada, at 340,000 t against 58,485 t in Croatia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium between Canada and Croatia?
- 281,515 t, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Croatia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
- How do Canada and Croatia rank globally for calcium ammonium nitrate (can) and other mixtures with calcium?
- Canada ranks 6th and Croatia ranks 8th of 46 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) and other mixtures with calcium carbonate — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf