Australia vs Guatemala: Carbon dioxide emissions by income level, annual growth rate
Australia
0.6286 % change on previous year
in 2024
Guatemala
0.7311 % change on previous year
in 2024
Australia rank
147th
Guatemala rank
146th
Carbon dioxide emissions by income level, annual growth rate over time
- Australia
- Guatemala
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 0.7311 % change on previous year against 0.6286 % change on previous year in Australia, a difference of 0.1025 % change on previous year.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.2 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 71 times across 143 shared years of data; in 1875 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 147th and Guatemala ranks 146th of 215 countries.
Across the 16 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Guatemala in 13.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1870s | 3.14 % change on previous year | 108.41 % change on previous year | 105.26 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 1880s | 9.59 % change on previous year | 100.15 % change on previous year | 90.56 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 1890s | 3.95 % change on previous year | 79.39 % change on previous year | 75.44 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 1900s | 5.7 % change on previous year | 30.3 % change on previous year | 24.6 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 1910s | 5.85 % change on previous year | -16.8 % change on previous year | 22.65 % change on previous year | Australia |
| 1920s | 2.15 % change on previous year | 20.79 % change on previous year | 18.64 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 1930s | 3.78 % change on previous year | 29.36 % change on previous year | 25.58 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 1940s | 1.57 % change on previous year | 0.9806 % change on previous year | 0.5862 % change on previous year | Australia |
| 1950s | 4.6 % change on previous year | 8.15 % change on previous year | 3.55 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 1960s | 5.12 % change on previous year | 6.59 % change on previous year | 1.47 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 1970s | 3.58 % change on previous year | 7.65 % change on previous year | 4.08 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 1980s | 2.99 % change on previous year | -0.8279 % change on previous year | 3.82 % change on previous year | Australia |
| 1990s | 2.98 % change on previous year | 8.22 % change on previous year | 5.24 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 1.7 % change on previous year | 3.02 % change on previous year | 1.32 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 0.2011 % change on previous year | 5.25 % change on previous year | 5.05 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
| 2020s | -1.38 % change on previous year | 1.06 % change on previous year | 2.44 % change on previous year | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon dioxide emissions by income level, annual growth rate, Australia or Guatemala?
- Guatemala, at 0.7311 % change on previous year against 0.6286 % change on previous year in Australia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in carbon dioxide emissions by income level, annual growth rate between Australia and Guatemala?
- 0.1025 % change on previous year, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Guatemala?
- 143 years are reported by both, from 1875 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Guatemala rank globally for carbon dioxide emissions by income level, annual growth rate?
- Australia ranks 147th and Guatemala ranks 146th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide emissions by income level, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Carbon dioxide emissions by income level. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.