Costa Rica vs El Salvador: Carbon dioxide emissions by income level, annual growth rate
Costa Rica
3.4 % change on previous year
in 2024
El Salvador
3.49 % change on previous year
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
82nd
El Salvador rank
81st
Carbon dioxide emissions by income level, annual growth rate over time
- Costa Rica
- El Salvador
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 3.49 % change on previous year against 3.4 % change on previous year in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.09 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 79 times across 135 shared years of data; in 1875 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 82nd and El Salvador ranks 81st of 215 countries.
Across the 16 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 7 and El Salvador in 9.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1870s | 169.12 % change on previous year | 81.11 % change on previous year | 88.01 % change on previous year | Costa Rica |
| 1880s | 82.49 % change on previous year | 39.97 % change on previous year | 42.52 % change on previous year | Costa Rica |
| 1890s | 22.77 % change on previous year | 142.67 % change on previous year | 119.9 % change on previous year | El Salvador |
| 1900s | 22.49 % change on previous year | 68.84 % change on previous year | 46.35 % change on previous year | El Salvador |
| 1910s | -22.86 % change on previous year | 100.32 % change on previous year | 123.19 % change on previous year | El Salvador |
| 1920s | -19.71 % change on previous year | 9.13 % change on previous year | 28.84 % change on previous year | El Salvador |
| 1930s | 66.27 % change on previous year | -28.61 % change on previous year | 94.88 % change on previous year | Costa Rica |
| 1940s | 164.04 % change on previous year | -5.53 % change on previous year | 169.57 % change on previous year | Costa Rica |
| 1950s | 4.64 % change on previous year | 9.75 % change on previous year | 5.11 % change on previous year | El Salvador |
| 1960s | 12.11 % change on previous year | 9.27 % change on previous year | 2.84 % change on previous year | Costa Rica |
| 1970s | 9.73 % change on previous year | 7.34 % change on previous year | 2.39 % change on previous year | Costa Rica |
| 1980s | 0.9046 % change on previous year | 1.51 % change on previous year | 0.6053 % change on previous year | El Salvador |
| 1990s | 6.85 % change on previous year | 8.8 % change on previous year | 1.95 % change on previous year | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 3.69 % change on previous year | 1.29 % change on previous year | 2.4 % change on previous year | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 0.0195 % change on previous year | 2.24 % change on previous year | 2.22 % change on previous year | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 3.07 % change on previous year | 4.11 % change on previous year | 1.05 % change on previous year | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon dioxide emissions by income level, annual growth rate, Costa Rica or El Salvador?
- El Salvador, at 3.49 % change on previous year against 3.4 % change on previous year in Costa Rica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in carbon dioxide emissions by income level, annual growth rate between Costa Rica and El Salvador?
- 0.09 % change on previous year, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and El Salvador?
- 135 years are reported by both, from 1875 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and El Salvador rank globally for carbon dioxide emissions by income level, annual growth rate?
- Costa Rica ranks 82nd and El Salvador ranks 81st of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide emissions by income level, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Carbon dioxide emissions by income level. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.