Indonesia vs Russia: Carbon dioxide emissions by income level, gaps filled

Indonesia
812.22 million tonnes
in 2024
Russia
1.78 billion tonnes
in 2024
Indonesia rank
6th
Russia rank
4th

Carbon dioxide emissions by income level, gaps filled over time

  • Indonesia
  • Russia
01.0B2.0B3.0B183019272024

How they compare

Russia currently reports 1.78 billion tonnes against 812.22 million tonnes in Indonesia, a difference of 968.30 million tonnes.

That makes Russia's figure about 2.2 times Indonesia's.

Across all 136 years both countries report, Russia has been ahead every year.

Indonesia ranks 6th and Russia ranks 4th of 215 countries.

Russia has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Russia Difference Ahead
1880s 3,664 tonnes 14.65 million tonnes 14.64 million tonnes Russia
1890s 626,201 tonnes 26.03 million tonnes 25.40 million tonnes Russia
1900s 3.67 million tonnes 50.17 million tonnes 46.50 million tonnes Russia
1910s 6.53 million tonnes 56.76 million tonnes 50.24 million tonnes Russia
1920s 11.39 million tonnes 39.98 million tonnes 28.59 million tonnes Russia
1930s 21.17 million tonnes 180.96 million tonnes 159.79 million tonnes Russia
1940s 13.91 million tonnes 255.53 million tonnes 241.62 million tonnes Russia
1950s 17.09 million tonnes 615.35 million tonnes 598.26 million tonnes Russia
1960s 24.90 million tonnes 1.12 billion tonnes 1.10 billion tonnes Russia
1970s 60.56 million tonnes 1.78 billion tonnes 1.72 billion tonnes Russia
1980s 115.00 million tonnes 2.26 billion tonnes 2.14 billion tonnes Russia
1990s 225.41 million tonnes 1.81 billion tonnes 1.58 billion tonnes Russia
2000s 343.31 million tonnes 1.56 billion tonnes 1.22 billion tonnes Russia
2010s 539.55 million tonnes 1.66 billion tonnes 1.12 billion tonnes Russia
2020s 717.77 million tonnes 1.70 billion tonnes 981.34 million tonnes Russia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide emissions by income level, gaps filled, Indonesia or Russia?
Russia, at 1.78 billion tonnes against 812.22 million tonnes in Indonesia as of 2024.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide emissions by income level, gaps filled between Indonesia and Russia?
968.30 million tonnes, with Russia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Russia?
136 years are reported by both, from 1889 to 2024.
How do Indonesia and Russia rank globally for carbon dioxide emissions by income level, gaps filled?
Indonesia ranks 6th and Russia ranks 4th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide emissions by income level, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs Russia: Carbon dioxide emissions by income level, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-emissions-by-income-level-gaps-filled/indonesia/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-emissions-by-income-level-gaps-filled/indonesia/russian-federation/">Indonesia vs Russia: Carbon dioxide emissions by income level, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide emissions by income level, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 23,667 data points, 1750–2024
Last refreshed

Carbon dioxide emissions by income level with 84 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.