Philippines vs Uzbekistan: Carbon dioxide emissions by income level, gaps filled

Philippines
174.88 million tonnes
in 2024
Uzbekistan
139.23 million tonnes
in 2024
Philippines rank
32nd
Uzbekistan rank
35th

Carbon dioxide emissions by income level, gaps filled over time

  • Philippines
  • Uzbekistan
050.0M100.0M150.0M183019272024

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 174.88 million tonnes against 139.23 million tonnes in Uzbekistan, a difference of 35.64 million tonnes.

That makes Philippines's figure about 1.3 times Uzbekistan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 118 shared years of data; in 1907 it was Uzbekistan ahead.

Philippines ranks 32nd and Uzbekistan ranks 35th of 215 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 12.

Head to head by decade

Decade Philippines Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1900s 26,869 tonnes 2.46 million tonnes 2.44 million tonnes Uzbekistan
1910s 32,243 tonnes 2.42 million tonnes 2.38 million tonnes Uzbekistan
1920s 73,588 tonnes 1.68 million tonnes 1.61 million tonnes Uzbekistan
1930s 99,965 tonnes 7.52 million tonnes 7.42 million tonnes Uzbekistan
1940s 122,140 tonnes 10.68 million tonnes 10.56 million tonnes Uzbekistan
1950s 5.50 million tonnes 25.31 million tonnes 19.81 million tonnes Uzbekistan
1960s 14.50 million tonnes 46.96 million tonnes 32.46 million tonnes Uzbekistan
1970s 32.03 million tonnes 75.03 million tonnes 43.00 million tonnes Uzbekistan
1980s 33.76 million tonnes 94.89 million tonnes 61.13 million tonnes Uzbekistan
1990s 55.67 million tonnes 110.84 million tonnes 55.17 million tonnes Uzbekistan
2000s 71.24 million tonnes 124.96 million tonnes 53.72 million tonnes Uzbekistan
2010s 109.49 million tonnes 109.55 million tonnes 64,710 tonnes Uzbekistan
2020s 151.71 million tonnes 122.50 million tonnes 29.21 million tonnes Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide emissions by income level, gaps filled, Philippines or Uzbekistan?
Philippines, at 174.88 million tonnes against 139.23 million tonnes in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide emissions by income level, gaps filled between Philippines and Uzbekistan?
35.64 million tonnes, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Uzbekistan?
118 years are reported by both, from 1907 to 2024.
How do Philippines and Uzbekistan rank globally for carbon dioxide emissions by income level, gaps filled?
Philippines ranks 32nd and Uzbekistan ranks 35th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide emissions by income level, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Philippines vs Uzbekistan: Carbon dioxide emissions by income level, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-emissions-by-income-level-gaps-filled/philippines/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-emissions-by-income-level-gaps-filled/philippines/uzbekistan/">Philippines vs Uzbekistan: Carbon dioxide emissions by income level, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide emissions by income level, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 23,667 data points, 1750–2024
Last refreshed

Carbon dioxide emissions by income level with 84 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.