Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs South Africa: Carbon stock change in forests — Area, annual growth rate

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
-0.4381 % change on previous year
in 2025
South Africa
0.3839 % change on previous year
in 2025
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
26th
South Africa rank
29th

Carbon stock change in forests — Area, annual growth rate over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • South Africa
-0.75-0.5-0.2500.250.5199120082025

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 0.3839 % change on previous year against -0.4381 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 0.822 % change on previous year.

Across all 35 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 26th and South Africa ranks 29th of 32 groups.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s -0.4249 % change on previous year 0.4343 % change on previous year 0.8591 % change on previous year South Africa
2000s -0.5175 % change on previous year 0.4171 % change on previous year 0.9346 % change on previous year South Africa
2010s -0.5731 % change on previous year 0.4003 % change on previous year 0.9734 % change on previous year South Africa
2020s -0.4527 % change on previous year 0.3879 % change on previous year 0.8406 % change on previous year South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon stock change in forests — area, annual growth rate, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or South Africa?
South Africa, at 0.3839 % change on previous year against -0.4381 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2025.
What is the difference in carbon stock change in forests — area, annual growth rate between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and South Africa?
0.822 % change on previous year, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and South Africa?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and South Africa rank globally for carbon stock change in forests — area, annual growth rate?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 26th and South Africa ranks 29th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon stock change in forests — Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs South Africa: Carbon stock change in forests — Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-stock-change-in-forests-area-annual-growth-rate/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-stock-change-in-forests-area-annual-growth-rate/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/south-africa/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs South Africa: Carbon stock change in forests — Area, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon stock change in forests — Area, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
268 places, 9,080 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Carbon stock change in forests — Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.