Australia and New Zealand vs Northern America: Carbon stock change in forests — Area

Australia and New Zealand
143,871 1000 ha
in 2025
Northern America
678,251 1000 ha
in 2025
Australia and New Zealand rank
7th
Northern America rank
9th

Carbon stock change in forests — Area over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Northern America
200.0k400.0k600.0k199020072025

How they compare

Northern America currently reports 678,251 1000 ha against 143,871 1000 ha in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 534,380 1000 ha.

That makes Northern America's figure about 4.7 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Northern America has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 7th and Northern America ranks 9th of 223 countries.

Northern America has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Northern America Difference Ahead
1990s 143,627 1000 ha 664,385 1000 ha 520,758 1000 ha Northern America
2000s 142,229 1000 ha 668,571 1000 ha 526,343 1000 ha Northern America
2010s 142,180 1000 ha 677,176 1000 ha 534,996 1000 ha Northern America
2020s 143,572 1000 ha 678,474 1000 ha 534,902 1000 ha Northern America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon stock change in forests — area, Australia and New Zealand or Northern America?
Northern America, at 678,251 1000 ha against 143,871 1000 ha in Australia and New Zealand as of 2025.
What is the difference in carbon stock change in forests — area between Australia and New Zealand and Northern America?
534,380 1000 ha, with Northern America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Northern America?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Northern America rank globally for carbon stock change in forests — area?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 7th and Northern America ranks 9th of 223 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Carbon stock change in forests — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Northern America: Carbon stock change in forests — Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-stock-change-in-forests-area-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/northern-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-stock-change-in-forests-area-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/northern-america/">Australia and New Zealand vs Northern America: Carbon stock change in forests — Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon stock change in forests — Area
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
275 places, 9,600 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).