Australia vs Congo: Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per capita

Australia
0.0048 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Congo
0.0034 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Australia rank
7th
Congo rank
10th

Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per capita over time

  • Australia
  • Congo
00.0020.0040.0060.0080.01199020072025

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.0048 1000 ha per person against 0.0034 1000 ha per person in Congo, a difference of 0.0014 1000 ha per person.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.4 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.

Australia ranks 7th and Congo ranks 10th of 191 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Congo in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0075 1000 ha per person 0.0083 1000 ha per person 0.0008 1000 ha per person Congo
2000s 0.0066 1000 ha per person 0.0061 1000 ha per person 0.0005 1000 ha per person Australia
2010s 0.0056 1000 ha per person 0.0044 1000 ha per person 0.0012 1000 ha per person Australia
2020s 0.005 1000 ha per person 0.0036 1000 ha per person 0.0015 1000 ha per person Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon stock change in forests — area, per capita, Australia or Congo?
Australia, at 0.0048 1000 ha per person against 0.0034 1000 ha per person in Congo as of 2025.
What is the difference in carbon stock change in forests — area, per capita between Australia and Congo?
0.0014 1000 ha per person, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Congo?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Australia and Congo rank globally for carbon stock change in forests — area, per capita?
Australia ranks 7th and Congo ranks 10th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Congo: Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-stock-change-in-forests-area-per-capita/australia/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-stock-change-in-forests-area-per-capita/australia/congo-rep/">Australia vs Congo: Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per capita
Unit
1000 ha per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 6,723 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

Carbon stock change in forests — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.