Equatorial Guinea vs Montenegro: Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per capita

Equatorial Guinea
0.0012 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Montenegro
0.0013 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
31st
Montenegro rank
29th

Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per capita over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Montenegro
0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.006199020072025

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 0.0013 1000 ha per person against 0.0012 1000 ha per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0001 1000 ha per person.

That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 31st and Montenegro ranks 29th of 191 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0024 1000 ha per person 0.0013 1000 ha per person 0.0012 1000 ha per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0018 1000 ha per person 0.0013 1000 ha per person 0.0004 1000 ha per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0013 1000 ha per person 0.0013 1000 ha per person 0 1000 ha per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon stock change in forests — area, per capita, Equatorial Guinea or Montenegro?
Montenegro, at 0.0013 1000 ha per person against 0.0012 1000 ha per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in carbon stock change in forests — area, per capita between Equatorial Guinea and Montenegro?
0.0001 1000 ha per person, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Montenegro?
20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Montenegro rank globally for carbon stock change in forests — area, per capita?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 31st and Montenegro ranks 29th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Montenegro: Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-stock-change-in-forests-area-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-stock-change-in-forests-area-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/montenegro/">Equatorial Guinea vs Montenegro: Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per capita
Unit
1000 ha per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 6,723 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

Carbon stock change in forests — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.