South Sudan vs Uruguay: Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per capita
South Sudan
0.0006 1000 ha per person
in 2025
Uruguay
0.0006 1000 ha per person
in 2025
South Sudan rank
52nd
Uruguay rank
51st
Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per capita over time
- South Sudan
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 0.0006 1000 ha per person against 0.0006 1000 ha per person in South Sudan, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
South Sudan ranks 52nd and Uruguay ranks 51st of 191 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0007 1000 ha per person | 0.0005 1000 ha per person | 0.0001 1000 ha per person | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.0006 1000 ha per person | 0.0006 1000 ha per person | 0 1000 ha per person | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon stock change in forests — area, per capita, South Sudan or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 0.0006 1000 ha per person against 0.0006 1000 ha per person in South Sudan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in carbon stock change in forests — area, per capita between South Sudan and Uruguay?
- 0 1000 ha per person, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Uruguay?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do South Sudan and Uruguay rank globally for carbon stock change in forests — area, per capita?
- South Sudan ranks 52nd and Uruguay ranks 51st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Carbon stock change in forests — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.