Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per square kilometre

Cuba
0.0349 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.036 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
83rd
Zimbabwe rank
81st

Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per square kilometre over time

  • Cuba
  • Zimbabwe
00.010.020.030.04199020062023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.036 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.0349 1000 ha per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0.0011 1000 ha per square kilometre.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 83rd and Zimbabwe ranks 81st of 191 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0232 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0423 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0191 1000 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0275 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0395 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.012 1000 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0329 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0372 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0043 1000 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0348 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0362 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0014 1000 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon stock change in forests — area, per square kilometre, Cuba or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.036 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.0349 1000 ha per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon stock change in forests — area, per square kilometre between Cuba and Zimbabwe?
0.0011 1000 ha per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Zimbabwe rank globally for carbon stock change in forests — area, per square kilometre?
Cuba ranks 83rd and Zimbabwe ranks 81st of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-stock-change-in-forests-area-per-square-kilometre/cuba/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-stock-change-in-forests-area-per-square-kilometre/cuba/zimbabwe/">Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 6,341 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Carbon stock change in forests — Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.