Lithuania vs Zimbabwe: Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per square kilometre

Lithuania
0.0353 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.036 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Lithuania rank
82nd
Zimbabwe rank
81st

Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per square kilometre over time

  • Lithuania
  • Zimbabwe
00.010.020.030.04199020062023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.036 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.0353 1000 ha per square kilometre in Lithuania, a difference of 0.0007 1000 ha per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Lithuania ranks 82nd and Zimbabwe ranks 81st of 191 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0317 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.042 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0103 1000 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0333 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0395 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0062 1000 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0349 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0372 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0023 1000 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0352 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0362 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.001 1000 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon stock change in forests — area, per square kilometre, Lithuania or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.036 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.0353 1000 ha per square kilometre in Lithuania as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon stock change in forests — area, per square kilometre between Lithuania and Zimbabwe?
0.0007 1000 ha per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Zimbabwe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Lithuania and Zimbabwe rank globally for carbon stock change in forests — area, per square kilometre?
Lithuania ranks 82nd and Zimbabwe ranks 81st of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Zimbabwe: Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-stock-change-in-forests-area-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-stock-change-in-forests-area-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/zimbabwe/">Lithuania vs Zimbabwe: Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 6,341 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Carbon stock change in forests — Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.