Portugal vs Zimbabwe: Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per square kilometre

Portugal
0.0366 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.036 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Portugal rank
78th
Zimbabwe rank
81st

Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per square kilometre over time

  • Portugal
  • Zimbabwe
00.010.020.030.04199020062023

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 0.0366 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.036 1000 ha per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0006 1000 ha per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Portugal ranks 78th and Zimbabwe ranks 81st of 191 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Portugal averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Portugal Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0374 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0423 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0049 1000 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0363 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0395 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0032 1000 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.036 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0372 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0012 1000 ha per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0365 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0362 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 ha per square kilometre Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon stock change in forests — area, per square kilometre, Portugal or Zimbabwe?
Portugal, at 0.0366 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.036 1000 ha per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon stock change in forests — area, per square kilometre between Portugal and Zimbabwe?
0.0006 1000 ha per square kilometre, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Portugal and Zimbabwe rank globally for carbon stock change in forests — area, per square kilometre?
Portugal ranks 78th and Zimbabwe ranks 81st of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Portugal vs Zimbabwe: Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-stock-change-in-forests-area-per-square-kilometre/portugal/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-stock-change-in-forests-area-per-square-kilometre/portugal/zimbabwe/">Portugal vs Zimbabwe: Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 6,341 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Carbon stock change in forests — Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.