Belgium vs Guam: Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest)
Belgium
-100 % change on previous year
in 2021
Guam
-100 % change on previous year
in 2016
Belgium rank
202nd
Guam rank
202nd
Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest) over time
- Belgium
- Guam
How they compare
Belgium currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Guam, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Guam ahead.
Belgium ranks 202nd and Guam ranks 202nd of 212 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon stock change in forests — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest), Belgium or Guam?
- Belgium, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Guam as of 2021.
- What is the difference in carbon stock change in forests — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest) between Belgium and Guam?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Guam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2016.
- How do Belgium and Guam rank globally for carbon stock change in forests — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest)?
- Belgium ranks 202nd and Guam ranks 202nd of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.