Israel vs New Caledonia: Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest)

Israel
100 % change on previous year
in 2016
New Caledonia
100 % change on previous year
in 2016
Israel rank
1st
New Caledonia rank
1st

Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest) over time

  • Israel
  • New Caledonia
-200-1000100199120032016

How they compare

Israel currently reports 100 % change on previous year against 100 % change on previous year in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

Across all 25 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.

Israel ranks 1st and New Caledonia ranks 1st of 212 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1990s 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year —
2000s -15.56 % change on previous year 8.25 % change on previous year 23.8 % change on previous year New Caledonia
2010s 16.67 % change on previous year 16.67 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon stock change in forests — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest), Israel or New Caledonia?
Israel, at 100 % change on previous year against 100 % change on previous year in New Caledonia as of 2016.
What is the difference in carbon stock change in forests — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest) between Israel and New Caledonia?
0 % change on previous year, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and New Caledonia?
25 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2016.
How do Israel and New Caledonia rank globally for carbon stock change in forests — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest)?
Israel ranks 1st and New Caledonia ranks 1st of 212 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs New Caledonia: Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-stock-change-in-forests-net-emissions-removals-co2-forest-land-annual-growth-rate/israel/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-stock-change-in-forests-net-emissions-removals-co2-forest-land-annual-growth-rate/israel/new-caledonia/">Israel vs New Caledonia: Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 7,668 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.