Liechtenstein vs United Republic of Tanzania: Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest)

Liechtenstein
0 % change on previous year
in 2025
United Republic of Tanzania
0 % change on previous year
in 2025
Liechtenstein rank
24th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
24th

Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest) over time

  • Liechtenstein
  • United Republic of Tanzania
-100-75-50-25025199120082025

How they compare

Liechtenstein currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1991 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Liechtenstein ranks 24th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 24th of 212 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Liechtenstein averaged higher in 1 and United Republic of Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Liechtenstein United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year —
2000s 2.5 % change on previous year -0.0007 % change on previous year 2.5 % change on previous year Liechtenstein
2010s -50 % change on previous year -0.0036 % change on previous year 50 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon stock change in forests — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest), Liechtenstein or United Republic of Tanzania?
Liechtenstein, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2025.
What is the difference in carbon stock change in forests — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest) between Liechtenstein and United Republic of Tanzania?
0 % change on previous year, with Liechtenstein ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Liechtenstein and United Republic of Tanzania?
25 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Liechtenstein and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for carbon stock change in forests — net emissions/removals (co2) (forest)?
Liechtenstein ranks 24th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 24th of 212 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Liechtenstein vs United Republic of Tanzania: Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-stock-change-in-forests-net-emissions-removals-co2-forest-land-annual-growth-rate/liechtenstein/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-stock-change-in-forests-net-emissions-removals-co2-forest-land-annual-growth-rate/liechtenstein/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Liechtenstein vs United Republic of Tanzania: Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 7,668 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.