Eritrea vs Zimbabwe: Carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), Millions … annual

Eritrea
-0.2432 % change on previous year
in 2023
Zimbabwe
-0.2741 % change on previous year
in 2023
Eritrea rank
142nd
Zimbabwe rank
145th

Carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), Millions … annual over time

  • Eritrea
  • Zimbabwe
-10-8-6-4-20199320082023

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports -0.2432 % change on previous year against -0.2741 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0309 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Eritrea ranks 142nd and Zimbabwe ranks 145th of 196 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s -0.2595 % change on previous year -0.2414 % change on previous year 0.018 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2000s -0.2565 % change on previous year -0.2581 % change on previous year 0.0016 % change on previous year Eritrea
2010s -0.2426 % change on previous year -1.21 % change on previous year 0.9671 % change on previous year Eritrea
2020s -0.2386 % change on previous year -0.2759 % change on previous year 0.0372 % change on previous year Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), millions of metric, Eritrea or Zimbabwe?
Eritrea, at -0.2432 % change on previous year against -0.2741 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), millions of metric between Eritrea and Zimbabwe?
0.0309 % change on previous year, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Zimbabwe?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Eritrea and Zimbabwe rank globally for carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), millions of metric?
Eritrea ranks 142nd and Zimbabwe ranks 145th of 196 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), Millions of Metric Tonnes (Not Applicable), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Zimbabwe: Carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), Millions of Metric. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-stocks-in-living-biomass-in-forests-millions-of-metric-tonnes-not-applicable-2/eritrea/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-stocks-in-living-biomass-in-forests-millions-of-metric-tonnes-not-applicable-2/eritrea/zimbabwe/">Eritrea vs Zimbabwe: Carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), Millions of Metric</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), Millions of Metric Tonnes (Not Applicable), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 6,383 data points, 1993–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), Millions of Metric Tonnes (Not Applicable). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.