Serbia and Montenegro vs United States Virgin Islands: Carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), Millions … annual

Serbia and Montenegro
4.8 % change on previous year
in 2005
United States Virgin Islands
5.49 % change on previous year
in 2023
Serbia and Montenegro rank
2nd
United States Virgin Islands rank
1st

Carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), Millions … annual over time

  • Serbia and Montenegro
  • United States Virgin Islands
-2.502.557.5199320082023

How they compare

United States Virgin Islands currently reports 5.49 % change on previous year against 4.8 % change on previous year in Serbia and Montenegro, a difference of 0.69 % change on previous year.

That makes United States Virgin Islands's figure about 1.1 times Serbia and Montenegro's.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Serbia and Montenegro has been ahead every year.

Serbia and Montenegro ranks 2nd and United States Virgin Islands ranks 1st of 196 countries.

Serbia and Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Serbia and Montenegro United States Virgin Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 0.5032 % change on previous year -1.81 % change on previous year 2.31 % change on previous year Serbia and Montenegro
2000s 4.53 % change on previous year 2.62 % change on previous year 1.91 % change on previous year Serbia and Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), millions of metric, Serbia and Montenegro or United States Virgin Islands?
United States Virgin Islands, at 5.49 % change on previous year against 4.8 % change on previous year in Serbia and Montenegro as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), millions of metric between Serbia and Montenegro and United States Virgin Islands?
0.69 % change on previous year, with United States Virgin Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Montenegro and United States Virgin Islands?
13 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2005.
How do Serbia and Montenegro and United States Virgin Islands rank globally for carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), millions of metric?
Serbia and Montenegro ranks 2nd and United States Virgin Islands ranks 1st of 196 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), Millions of Metric Tonnes (Not Applicable), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia and Montenegro vs United States Virgin Islands: Carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), Millions of Metric. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-stocks-in-living-biomass-in-forests-millions-of-metric-tonnes-not-applicable-2/item-13/virgin-islands-u-s/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-stocks-in-living-biomass-in-forests-millions-of-metric-tonnes-not-applicable-2/item-13/virgin-islands-u-s/">Serbia and Montenegro vs United States Virgin Islands: Carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), Millions of Metric</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), Millions of Metric Tonnes (Not Applicable), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 6,383 data points, 1993–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), Millions of Metric Tonnes (Not Applicable). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.