Mauritius vs New Zealand: Carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), Millions … annual

Mauritius
0.1017 % change on previous year
in 2023
New Zealand
0.1308 % change on previous year
in 2023
Mauritius rank
54th
New Zealand rank
53rd

Carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), Millions … annual over time

  • Mauritius
  • New Zealand
-1-0.500.51199320082023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.1308 % change on previous year against 0.1017 % change on previous year in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0291 % change on previous year.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.3 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was New Zealand ahead.

Mauritius ranks 54th and New Zealand ranks 53rd of 196 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 0.2073 % change on previous year 0.4413 % change on previous year 0.234 % change on previous year New Zealand
2000s -0.6815 % change on previous year 0.3825 % change on previous year 1.06 % change on previous year New Zealand
2010s 0.005 % change on previous year 0.2544 % change on previous year 0.2494 % change on previous year New Zealand
2020s 0.1027 % change on previous year 0.1141 % change on previous year 0.0114 % change on previous year New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), millions of metric, Mauritius or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 0.1308 % change on previous year against 0.1017 % change on previous year in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), millions of metric between Mauritius and New Zealand?
0.0291 % change on previous year, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and New Zealand?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and New Zealand rank globally for carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), millions of metric?
Mauritius ranks 54th and New Zealand ranks 53rd of 196 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), Millions of Metric Tonnes (Not Applicable), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs New Zealand: Carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), Millions of Metric. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-stocks-in-living-biomass-in-forests-millions-of-metric-tonnes-not-applicable-2/mauritius/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-stocks-in-living-biomass-in-forests-millions-of-metric-tonnes-not-applicable-2/mauritius/new-zealand/">Mauritius vs New Zealand: Carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), Millions of Metric</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), Millions of Metric Tonnes (Not Applicable), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 6,383 data points, 1993–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), Millions of Metric Tonnes (Not Applicable). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.