New Zealand vs Western Sahara: Carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), Millions … annual
Carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), Millions … annual over time
- New Zealand
- Western Sahara
How they compare
Western Sahara currently reports 0.1661 % change on previous year against 0.1308 % change on previous year in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0353 % change on previous year.
That makes Western Sahara's figure about 1.3 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Western Sahara ahead.
New Zealand ranks 53rd and Western Sahara ranks 50th of 196 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Western Sahara in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Western Sahara | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4413 % change on previous year | 1.08 % change on previous year | 0.6418 % change on previous year | Western Sahara |
| 2000s | 0.3825 % change on previous year | 0.5785 % change on previous year | 0.196 % change on previous year | Western Sahara |
| 2010s | 0.2544 % change on previous year | 0.2251 % change on previous year | 0.0293 % change on previous year | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 0.1141 % change on previous year | 0.1753 % change on previous year | 0.0612 % change on previous year | Western Sahara |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), millions of metric, New Zealand or Western Sahara?
- Western Sahara, at 0.1661 % change on previous year against 0.1308 % change on previous year in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), millions of metric between New Zealand and Western Sahara?
- 0.0353 % change on previous year, with Western Sahara ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Western Sahara?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do New Zealand and Western Sahara rank globally for carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), millions of metric?
- New Zealand ranks 53rd and Western Sahara ranks 50th of 196 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), Millions of Metric Tonnes (Not Applicable), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), Millions of Metric Tonnes (Not Applicable). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.