Cape Verde vs Lesotho: Carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), Millions of Metric
Cape Verde
2.67
in 2023
Lesotho
1.64
in 2023
Cape Verde rank
170th
Lesotho rank
172nd
Carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), Millions of Metric over time
- Cape Verde
- Lesotho
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 2.67 against 1.64 in Lesotho, a difference of 1.03.
That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.6 times Lesotho's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lesotho ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 170th and Lesotho ranks 172nd of 198 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.65 | 1.64 | 0.0061 | Cape Verde |
| 2000s | 2.35 | 1.64 | 0.7098 | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 2.52 | 1.64 | 0.8814 | Cape Verde |
| 2020s | 2.64 | 1.64 | 1 | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), millions of metric, Cape Verde or Lesotho?
- Cape Verde, at 2.67 against 1.64 in Lesotho as of 2023.
- What is the difference in carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), millions of metric between Cape Verde and Lesotho?
- 1.03, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Lesotho?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Cape Verde and Lesotho rank globally for carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), millions of metric?
- Cape Verde ranks 170th and Lesotho ranks 172nd of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), Millions of Metric Tonnes (Not Applicable). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides information on global climate and weather patterns, providing insights into temperature variations, land cover accounts, and shifts in mean sea levels.