Kazakhstan vs Pakistan: Carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), Millions of Metric
Kazakhstan
172.74
in 2023
Pakistan
166.23
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
94th
Pakistan rank
95th
Carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), Millions of Metric over time
- Kazakhstan
- Pakistan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 172.74 against 166.23 in Pakistan, a difference of 6.51.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Pakistan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 94th and Pakistan ranks 95th of 198 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 150.08 | 218.07 | 67.99 | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 152.95 | 199.52 | 46.58 | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 165.44 | 181.71 | 16.26 | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 172.74 | 169.09 | 3.65 | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), millions of metric, Kazakhstan or Pakistan?
- Kazakhstan, at 172.74 against 166.23 in Pakistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), millions of metric between Kazakhstan and Pakistan?
- 6.51, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Pakistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Pakistan rank globally for carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), millions of metric?
- Kazakhstan ranks 94th and Pakistan ranks 95th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), Millions of Metric Tonnes (Not Applicable). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides information on global climate and weather patterns, providing insights into temperature variations, land cover accounts, and shifts in mean sea levels.