Mauritania vs Samoa: Carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), Millions of Metric
Mauritania
10.45
in 2023
Samoa
9.49
in 2023
Mauritania rank
153rd
Samoa rank
155th
Carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), Millions of Metric over time
- Mauritania
- Samoa
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 10.45 against 9.49 in Samoa, a difference of 0.96.
That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.1 times Samoa's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Mauritania ahead.
Mauritania ranks 153rd and Samoa ranks 155th of 198 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.56 | 10.29 | 1.27 | Mauritania |
| 2000s | 10.59 | 10.03 | 0.5586 | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 10.36 | 9.73 | 0.629 | Mauritania |
| 2020s | 10.69 | 9.53 | 1.16 | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), millions of metric, Mauritania or Samoa?
- Mauritania, at 10.45 against 9.49 in Samoa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), millions of metric between Mauritania and Samoa?
- 0.96, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Samoa?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Mauritania and Samoa rank globally for carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), millions of metric?
- Mauritania ranks 153rd and Samoa ranks 155th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon stocks in living biomass (in forests), Millions of Metric Tonnes (Not Applicable). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides information on global climate and weather patterns, providing insights into temperature variations, land cover accounts, and shifts in mean sea levels.