Belarus vs El Salvador: Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Belarus
0.0089 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador
0.0081 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
20th
El Salvador rank
23rd

Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • El Salvador
0.0030.0050.0070.010.0130.015196119922023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0.0089 kt per square kilometre against 0.0081 kt per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 0.0008 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was El Salvador ahead.

Belarus ranks 20th and El Salvador ranks 23rd of 176 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus El Salvador Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0054 kt per square kilometre 0.0106 kt per square kilometre 0.0052 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 0.0073 kt per square kilometre 0.0102 kt per square kilometre 0.0029 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 0.0087 kt per square kilometre 0.0109 kt per square kilometre 0.0022 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 0.0087 kt per square kilometre 0.0081 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals excluding rice — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Belarus or El Salvador?
Belarus, at 0.0089 kt per square kilometre against 0.0081 kt per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals excluding rice — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Belarus and El Salvador?
0.0008 kt per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and El Salvador?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and El Salvador rank globally for cereals excluding rice — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 20th and El Salvador ranks 23rd of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs El Salvador: Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-excluding-rice-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-excluding-rice-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/el-salvador/">Belarus vs El Salvador: Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 9,914 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.