Brazil vs Sri Lanka: Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Brazil
0.0027 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
0.0031 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
53rd
Sri Lanka rank
51st

Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Sri Lanka
00.0020.0040.006196119922023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0.0031 kt per square kilometre against 0.0027 kt per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 0.0004 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 53rd and Sri Lanka ranks 51st of 176 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0011 kt per square kilometre 0.0009 kt per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1970s 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0.0014 kt per square kilometre 0.0011 kt per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0023 kt per square kilometre 0.0018 kt per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.0028 kt per square kilometre 0.0022 kt per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 0.001 kt per square kilometre 0.0041 kt per square kilometre 0.0031 kt per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2010s 0.0017 kt per square kilometre 0.0037 kt per square kilometre 0.002 kt per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 0.0026 kt per square kilometre 0.0039 kt per square kilometre 0.0013 kt per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals excluding rice — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Brazil or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 0.0031 kt per square kilometre against 0.0027 kt per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals excluding rice — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Brazil and Sri Lanka?
0.0004 kt per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Sri Lanka rank globally for cereals excluding rice — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 53rd and Sri Lanka ranks 51st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Sri Lanka: Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-excluding-rice-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/brazil/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-excluding-rice-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/brazil/sri-lanka/">Brazil vs Sri Lanka: Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 9,914 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.