China vs El Salvador: Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

China
0.0079 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador
0.0081 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
24th
El Salvador rank
23rd

Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • China
  • El Salvador
00.0050.010.015196119922023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 0.0081 kt per square kilometre against 0.0079 kt per square kilometre in China, a difference of 0.0002 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.

China ranks 24th and El Salvador ranks 23rd of 176 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China El Salvador Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0011 kt per square kilometre 0.0054 kt per square kilometre 0.0043 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
1970s 0.0021 kt per square kilometre 0.0112 kt per square kilometre 0.009 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 0.0043 kt per square kilometre 0.0102 kt per square kilometre 0.0059 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 0.0061 kt per square kilometre 0.0106 kt per square kilometre 0.0044 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 0.0071 kt per square kilometre 0.0102 kt per square kilometre 0.0031 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 0.0086 kt per square kilometre 0.0109 kt per square kilometre 0.0023 kt per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 0.0079 kt per square kilometre 0.0081 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals excluding rice — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, China or El Salvador?
El Salvador, at 0.0081 kt per square kilometre against 0.0079 kt per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals excluding rice — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between China and El Salvador?
0.0002 kt per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and El Salvador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and El Salvador rank globally for cereals excluding rice — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
China ranks 24th and El Salvador ranks 23rd of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs El Salvador: Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-excluding-rice-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/china/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-excluding-rice-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/china/el-salvador/">China vs El Salvador: Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 9,914 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.