Guatemala vs Malta: Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Guatemala
0.0074 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
0.0057 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
25th
Malta rank
27th

Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • Malta
00.0050.010.015196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.0074 kt per square kilometre against 0.0057 kt per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 0.0017 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.3 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Guatemala ranks 25th and Malta ranks 27th of 176 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Malta Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0014 kt per square kilometre 0.0052 kt per square kilometre 0.0038 kt per square kilometre Malta
1970s 0.0022 kt per square kilometre 0.0053 kt per square kilometre 0.0031 kt per square kilometre Malta
1980s 0.003 kt per square kilometre 0.0067 kt per square kilometre 0.0037 kt per square kilometre Malta
1990s 0.0043 kt per square kilometre 0.0079 kt per square kilometre 0.0036 kt per square kilometre Malta
2000s 0.0048 kt per square kilometre 0.0086 kt per square kilometre 0.0038 kt per square kilometre Malta
2010s 0.0067 kt per square kilometre 0.008 kt per square kilometre 0.0013 kt per square kilometre Malta
2020s 0.0073 kt per square kilometre 0.0057 kt per square kilometre 0.0016 kt per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals excluding rice — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Guatemala or Malta?
Guatemala, at 0.0074 kt per square kilometre against 0.0057 kt per square kilometre in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals excluding rice — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Guatemala and Malta?
0.0017 kt per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Malta?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Malta rank globally for cereals excluding rice — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 25th and Malta ranks 27th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Malta: Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-excluding-rice-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-excluding-rice-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/malta/">Guatemala vs Malta: Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 9,914 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.