Namibia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Namibia
0.0001 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
0.0001 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia rank
139th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
137th

Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Namibia
  • Trinidad and Tobago
0000196119922023

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 0.0001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Namibia ranks 139th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 137th of 176 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals excluding rice — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Namibia or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 0.0001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals excluding rice — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Namibia and Trinidad and Tobago?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for cereals excluding rice — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Namibia ranks 139th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 137th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-excluding-rice-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/namibia/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-excluding-rice-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/namibia/trinidad-and-tobago/">Namibia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
177 places, 9,914 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals excluding rice — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.