Greenland vs Libya: Change co2 annual pct, gaps filled
Greenland
1.64
in 2024
Libya
1.62
in 2024
Greenland rank
118th
Libya rank
119th
Change co2 annual pct, gaps filled over time
- Greenland
- Libya
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 1.64 against 1.62 in Libya, a difference of 0.02.
The two have swapped places 45 times across 74 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Libya ahead.
Greenland ranks 118th and Libya ranks 119th of 215 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Greenland averaged higher in 2 and Libya in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greenland | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 15 | 15.26 | 0.2651 | Libya |
| 1960s | 7.15 | 100.19 | 93.04 | Libya |
| 1970s | 19.81 | 0.6817 | 19.13 | Greenland |
| 1980s | 6.19 | 3.81 | 2.38 | Greenland |
| 1990s | 2.9 | 3.75 | 0.8443 | Libya |
| 2000s | -0.0105 | 0.5173 | 0.5278 | Libya |
| 2010s | -0.3684 | 4.8 | 5.17 | Libya |
| 2020s | 3.34 | 4.03 | 0.6873 | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher change co2 annual pct, gaps filled, Greenland or Libya?
- Greenland, at 1.64 against 1.62 in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in change co2 annual pct, gaps filled between Greenland and Libya?
- 0.02, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Libya?
- 74 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2024.
- How do Greenland and Libya rank globally for change co2 annual pct, gaps filled?
- Greenland ranks 118th and Libya ranks 119th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Change co2 annual pct, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change co2 annual pct with 67 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.